Frontier Log

Benchmark · No longer reported

SWE-bench Verified

020406080100Apr 2025Jul 2025Oct 2025Jan 2026Apr 202662.3%3.7 Sonnet74.9%GPT-580.0%GPT-5.287.6%Opus 4.7020406080100Apr 2025Oct 2025Apr 202662.3%3.7 Sonnet74.9%GPT-587.6%Opus 4.7

Results

ModelScoreSourceHuman-verified
Claude Opus 4.716 Apr 2026 · Anthropic87.6%Introducing Claude Opus 4.7Source imageNot yet
Gemini 3.1 Pro19 Feb 2026 · Google80.6%Gemini 3.1 Pro: A smarter model for your most complex taskssingle attempt; Thinking (High)Source imageNot yet
Claude Opus 4.65 Feb 2026 · Anthropic80.8%Claude Opus 4.6averaged over 25 trials (footnote)Source imageNot yet
GPT-5.211 Dec 2025 · OpenAI80.0%Introducing GPT-5.2Not yet
Claude Opus 4.524 Nov 2025 · Anthropic80.9%Introducing Claude Opus 4.5no thinking budget, default effort (high), averaged over 5 trials (methodology)Source imageNot yet
Gemini 3 Pro18 Nov 2025 · Google76.2%Start building with Gemini 3single attemptSource imageNot yet
Claude Sonnet 4.529 Sep 2025 · Anthropic77.2%Introducing Claude Sonnet 4.5bash and file-editing tools, averaged over 10 trials, no test-time compute, 200K thinking budget (methodology)Source imageNot yet
Claude Sonnet 4.529 Sep 2025 · Anthropic82.0%Introducing Claude Sonnet 4.5parallel test-time compute; with parallel test-time computeSource imageNot yet
GPT-57 Aug 2025 · OpenAI74.9%Introducing GPT-5Not yet
Claude 3.7 Sonnet24 Feb 2025 · Anthropic62.3%Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Codepass@1 with bash/editor tools plus a 'thinking tool', averaged over 16 trials (footnote 2)Source imageYes
Claude 3.7 Sonnet24 Feb 2025 · Anthropic70.3%Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Codeparallel test-time compute; internal scoring and custom scaffold on a reduced subset of problems (footnote 2)Source imageYes

Benchmark

swebench.comHigher is better

All benchmarks