Frontier Log

Benchmark · Superseded

AIME 2024

020406080100Jan 2025Apr 202579.8%DeepSeek-R161.3%3.7 Sonnet36.7%GPT-4.592.0%Gemini 2.5 Pro91.6%OpenAI o3020406080100Jan 2025Apr 202579.8%DeepSeek-R161.3%3.7 Sonnet36.7%GPT-4.592.0%Gemini 2.5 Pro91.6%OpenAI o3

Results

ModelScoreSourceHuman-verified
OpenAI o316 Apr 2025 · OpenAI91.6%Introducing OpenAI o3 and o4-miniRead from the full-page screenshot (shots.jsonl part 2) of the HTML bar chart; value label above the bar. Post note under the chart set: 'All models are evaluated at high reasoning effort settings, similar to variants like o4-mini-high in ChatGPT.' Printed without % (y-axis 'Accuracy (%)'). Read from a full-page screenshot of the post (para-kb image /api/images/79), as openai.com is bot-walled.Yes
Gemini 2.5 Pro25 Mar 2025 · Google92.0%Gemini 2.5: Our most intelligent AI modelMethodology under the table: all Gemini 2.5 Pro scores are pass@1 (no majority voting or parallel test-time compute), run via AI Studio API model gemini-2.5-pro-exp-03-25 with default sampling, averaged over multiple trials for smaller benchmarks. No tools printed. The 'multiple attempts' sub-row is a dash for Gemini. The hero chart image does not show AIME 2024.Source imageYes
GPT-4.527 Feb 2025 · OpenAI36.7%Introducing GPT-4.5HTML table; the post prints no tools setting for this row (GPT-4.5 is a non-reasoning model and the table has no tool notes; the '*' footnote marks only the SWE rows), so no-tools is assumed. The fetched page text was truncated, so footnotes without a % sign are not visible in the extract.Yes
Claude 3.7 Sonnet24 Feb 2025 · Anthropic61.3%Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code64K extended thinking; pass@1 averaged over up to 16 trials. Chosen as primary over the no-extended-thinking column (both are own, non-parallel); flag if the other should be primary.Source imageYes
Claude 3.7 Sonnet24 Feb 2025 · Anthropic80.0%Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Codeparallel test-time compute; 64K extended thinking. Footnote 3: high score uses internal scoring with parallel test-time compute. Methodology: pass@1 averaged over up to 16 trials for AIME.Source imageYes
Claude 3.7 Sonnet24 Feb 2025 · Anthropic23.3%Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Codeanother report, not charted; No extended thinking; pass@1 averaged over up to 16 trials.Source imageYes
DeepSeek-R120 Jan 2025 · DeepSeek79.8%DeepSeek-R1 ReleasePass@1; post states no tool use either way, so no-tools by default. The distill table image prints AIME 2024 pass@1/cons@64 only for the distilled models and competitors, not for DeepSeek-R1.Source imageYes

Benchmark

maa.orgHigher is better

Mathematical Association of AmericaIntroduced 7 Feb 2024

All benchmarks